Home | View Cart | My Account | Order Status

Search

Best Sellers

Energizer Watch/Electronic Batteries, 3 Volts, 2032, 2 batteries (Lithium Button Cell)

$1.99

Eureka Hand-Held Vacuum, 71B

$35.00

Nady MPF-6 6-Inch Clamp On Microphone Pop Filter

$18.52

Office Supplies

Home »

Fellowes 24-Compartment Literature Organizer, Letter Size, Medium Oak (25043)

Fellowes 24-Compartment Literature Organizer, Letter Size, Medium Oak (25043)

(8 customer reviews)

List Price:	$107.00
Our Price:	$65.99 & this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping.
You Save:	$41.01 (38%)

SKU:

077511250439-FEL25043

In Stock

Usually ships in 1 business days

Note: Item may be sold and shipped by another company. Learn more.

Description:

Convenient 24-compartment sorter keeps letter size sales literature, mail, forms, or other items organized. Features corrugated divider system and high strength frame, with self-adhesive labels for easy file identification. Compartment dimensions: 2-1/2”H x 9"W x 11-5/8"D.

Features:

•

Organize sales literature, mail, forms, and more!

•

Includes 24 letter size sorting compartments

•

Corrugated divider system and high strength frame

•

Includes self-adhesive labels for easy file identification

•

Compartment dimensions: 2-1/2"H x 9"W x 11-5/8"D

Product Details:

Product Length:	11.88 inches
Product Width:	29.0 inches
Product Height:	23.44 inches
Product Weight:	0.06 pounds
Package Length:	33.0 inches
Package Width:	12.6 inches
Package Height:	6.4 inches
Package Weight:	25.05 pounds
Average Customer Rating:	based on 8 reviews

You may also like ...

Safco Products Wood Adjustable Literature Organizer, 36 Compartment, Oak (9424MO)

$107.47

X-Acto School Pro Heavy-Duty Electric Sharpener (1670)

$34.59

Safco Products Wood Adjustable Literature Organizer - 12 Compartment, Oak (9420MO)

$47.11

Customer Reviews:

Average Customer Review: 2.5

( 8 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

10 of 10 found the following review helpful:

Cheaply made - not a quality product at allAug 20, 2008
By Ms MG
Very disappointed in the quality of this product. It is very cheaply made and likely will not last even a year. The inner partitions are made of lightweight cardboard, and the outer case is an inferior form of particle board. Do not waste your money on this poorly made product.

3 of 3 found the following review helpful:

Fellowes 25043 Lit. Organizer reviewSep 25, 2008
By Cat Mallow "CatM."
The organizer is not perfect. I am annoyed with the plastic pieces that
are supposed to cover each shelf. They are hard to get on. Also, it is not all that sturdy. It was fairly easy to assemble.

4 of 5 found the following review helpful:

Review of Literature OrganizerFeb 26, 2009
By Liz
The product is everything I hoped it would be for storage of paper for my card-making hobby. However, I was terribly frustrated while trying to install the strips of plastic that finish and protect the front edge of the shelves. That took me four times as long to do as it took me to assemble the rest of the organizer and several of them look tacky. I think this was probably the result of faulty packaging, as most of them appear to have been crushed, making them very difficult to put in place.

1 of 1 found the following review helpful:

GarbageJun 30, 2010
By D. Bender
This is absolute garbage. I chose this product for it's reasonable seeming price and function. The inserts are made form cardboard and the frame is made from the cheapest particle board imaginable, it's possible that it is constructed from pencil shavings and Elmer's glue. After assembly, I noticed that one of the corners was not square so I applied a bit of force to the top only to find that the dowel in the upper right hand corner had broken through the particle board; the hole had been improperly drilled, it was too short for the dowel which having no other place to go chose to liberate itself from the confines of cheep particle board and veneer. Now our letter organizer is not only ugly, cheap, poorly engineered + constructed, it's broken. I work at a start-up and didn't want to pay a lot for this type of utility but looking back I probably should have. This is a completely worthless piece of garbage.

1 of 1 found the following review helpful:

poor qualitySep 21, 2008
By A. Mittal "neeraj"
I had one before , but this one was designed very poorly and I had to garbage it in about 2 weeks of use

See all 8 customer reviews on Amazon.com